top of page

The Fine Line Between Innovation and Infringement


The Weekend depiction

The landscape of music creation is undergoing a seismic shift with the advent of artificial intelligence, challenging our traditional notions of authorship and creative rights. The case of "Ghostwriter," who used AI to emulate the voices of Drake and The Weeknd, has brought these issues into sharp relief. This incident is not an isolated one but part of a burgeoning trend where AI's role in music ranges from composing melodies to creating deep-fake voices, sparking both awe and alarm within the industry.

As AI's capabilities expand, so too do concerns about its impact on the livelihoods of artists and the integrity of music rights.

The UK, in particular, is at a pivotal moment, reevaluating the balance between innovation and the fair compensation of music creators in light of the DCMS's inquiry into music streaming economics.

The core question that emerges is whether AI-generated music can, or should, be protected by copyright. English copyright law suggests a possibility, distinguishing between the inherent "originality" required for musical compositions and the broader protection afforded to sound recordings. This distinction raises critical questions about what constitutes "originality" in an AI-generated piece and who, if anyone, can claim ownership over such works.

Moreover, the ethical dimensions of AI in music creation cannot be overlooked. Tools like AIVA position themselves as creative assistants, hinting at a future where AI acts more as a collaborator than a creator. Yet, when AI assumes the mantle of creation, it forces us to reconsider the boundaries of copyright ownership.

Is it the individual who inputs prompts into an AI tool, or the developers of the AI itself, who hold the rights to the resulting music?

Deepfake vocal synthesizers add another layer of complexity, blurring the lines between imitation and infringement, and raising potential legal challenges around identity and consent. The industry finds itself at a juncture, faced with the task of addressing the potential copyright infringements AI might cause, especially through text and data mining.

This evolving discourse is not merely a legal matter but touches on deeper questions of creativity, innovation, and what it means to be an artist in the digital age. The industry's path forward will require a delicate balance between embracing AI's potential and safeguarding the essential human element that lies at the heart of musical expression. As we stand at this crossroads, the decisions made now will shape the future of music, determining how we value, protect, and define creative work in an era of unprecedented technological change.

11 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All


bottom of page